in vitro comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning capacity between rotary and manual preparation techniques in primary anterior teeth
نویسندگان
چکیده
objective: the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cleaning ability and instrumentation time of manual and rotary methods used for preparation of primary anterior teeth. materials and methods: forty-four primary anterior teeth were used in this experimental study. access cavities were prepared and india ink was injected into the canals. the samples were divided into three groups according to the instrument and preparation technique. in group i the root canals were manually instrumented with k-files. rotary flexmaster instruments were used for canal preparation in group ii, and the samples in group iii (control) were not instrumented. after canal preparation, the teeth were cleared with methyl salicilate and the removal of india ink was measured in the cervical, middle and apical thirds. the incidence of file breakage and instrumentation time was recorded in the three study groups. statistical analysis was performed using mann-whitney and t-tests. results: there was no significant difference in cleaning capacity between the two techniques, but a significant difference was found between the experimental and control groups. working time was significantly shorter when using the rotary system. no file fracture was observed during the study period. conclusion: regarding the shorter working time for rotary instrumentation and the similar cleaning ability of the two techniques, the application of the rotary system is suggested for preparation of decidious root canals during pulpectomy.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time between Rotary and Manual Instrumentation Techniques in Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time between manual Hedstrom files (H-files) and rotary Mtwo files in primary molar root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 90 primary root canals were selected using standardized radiographs. The canals were injected with India ink with 30 gauge insulin syringe and divided into three groups. Group...
متن کاملComparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time of Reciproc and Mtwo Rotary Systems in Primary Molars
Background and Aim: Pulpectomy of primary teeth is commonly performed with hand files and instruments. However, it is a time consuming procedure. Compared to hand files, rotary instrumentation has more advantages. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the cleaning efficacy and time taken for instrumentation of deciduous mo-lars using Reciproc and Mtwo rotary systems. Materials an...
متن کاملcomparison of the amount of debris extruded apically in two rotary techniques: flexmaster and m2
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولComparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation time using rotary, endodontic handpiece and hand files in primary molar teeth: (In-vitro )
Abstract Background & Aim : This study was aimed to compare the instrumentation time and the amount of debris extruded apically during root canal preparation using hand files ,Mtwo rotary system and endodontic handpiece in primary molar teeth. Method & Material : In this experimental study, sixty roots of primary molars of human teeth were assigned to three groups (for each group, n=20). The...
متن کاملcomparison of the cleaning capacity of mtwo and protaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth
background: root canal cleaning is an important step in endodontic therapy. in order to develop better techniques, a new generation of endodontic instruments has been designed. the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of manual k-files (mani co, tokyo, japan) and two rotary systems–mtwo (dentsply-maillefer, ballaigues, switzerland) and protaper (vdw, munich, germany)–for root cana...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
journal of dentistry, tehran university of medical sciencesجلد ۴، شماره ۲، صفحات ۵۹-۶۲
کلمات کلیدی
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023